Bavi se vrednovanjem i ocenjivanjem savremenih ili istorijskih književnih ostvarenja. 2. Priroda književnosti (Estetska funkcija jezika)
The book is structured to guide students through the fundamental building blocks of literary analysis: Stylistics (Stilistika):
Karakteristike lirske poezije (subjektivnost, emocionalnost, sažetost) i pregled lirskih vrsta (elegija, pisma, oda, rodoljubiva pesma). dragisa zivkovic teorija knjizevnosti pdf
The rain drummed against the window of the Belgrade library, a steady rhythm that matched Marko’s anxious pulse. On the oak table before him lay a weathered copy of by Dragiša Živković .
Born in Zaječar on August 13, 1914, and passing away in Novi Sad in May 2002, he was a distinguished Serbian literary historian and theorist, and a long-time university professor. His academic career was extensive, beginning at the University of Belgrade before moving to the University of Sarajevo, and finally to the University of Novi Sad's Faculty of Philosophy, where he became a full professor in 1963. At Novi Sad, he taught literary theory and 19th-century Serbian literature on the Department for Yugoslav Literature. He was also notably the Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo from 1959 to 1961. The rain drummed against the window of the
: Živković spent much of his career as a professor at the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad, where he influenced countless future writers and critics. The Literary Dictionary : Beyond his theory book, he was the chief editor of the Rečnik književnih termina
If you are analyzing the text, try to answer these questions based on the chapters: His academic career was extensive, beginning at the
Živković is most famous for his with exhaustive subcategories:
Vodič kroz Teoriju književnosti Dragiše Živkovića: Ključna literatura za studente i istraživače
(Theory of Literature with Theory of Literacy) is a foundational text in Serbian literary studies, serving for decades as the primary handbook for both university students and educators. Originally published in 1972, this work bridged the gap between traditional philology and modern structuralist approaches, offering a systematic categorization of literary knowledge. Core Structure and Content